5. How did the book change your view of the connection between science, art, and creativity?

Discussion on Uncommon Measure by Natalie Hodges - The Big Library Read pick for May 2025. It’s a thoughtful reflection on performance, cultural expectation, and finding meaning beyond mastery.
Forum rules
Our program is here to foster an inclusive, welcoming environment for all readers. To keep our community respectful and engaging, please follow these guidelines:

• Be kind and considerate to others.
• Stay on topic, keep discussions constructive, and use appropriate language.
• Trolling, spamming, harassment, or hate speech will not be tolerated.
• Share only original, non-copyrighted material and appropriate content.
• Do not post or share personal details about yourself or others, including real names, addresses, or any other identifying information.
• Do not post anything illegal, threatening, or otherwise harmful.
• Moderators reserve the right to remove content or suspend users who violate these guidelines.
• Users are responsible for their own posts, and our platform is not liable for user-generated content.
• Report issues instead of escalating, and respect moderator decisions.
Post Reply
smkelly
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2025 7:35 pm

5. How did the book change your view of the connection between science, art, and creativity?

Post by smkelly »

Despite her academic successes, Hodges has identified as "someone who never felt confident when formally studying math or science." She revealed that "the biggest epiphany for me, while writing this book, was the realization that you don't have to have a STEM background in order to explore and delight in science on your own terms."

In what ways are science and art connected? What new ideas did the book spark within you about creativity and the way our brains experience conditions such as performance anxiety?
erebus
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2025 5:03 am

Re: 5. How did the book change your view of the connection between science, art, and creativity?

Post by erebus »

Isn't that a leading question? As someone who has been interested in music and science since I was a small child, I would have to say that it didn't change my mind at all.

I'm not buying into the romantic notion that Quantum Entanglement has anything much to do with the synchronicity of humans (an animal species that has only survived this long because of our innate abilities to harmonise socially and express ourselves in complex ways). It does serve as a fun analogy though.

I also marvel at anyone who can pull off quick melodies on a stringed instrument with harmonics, because that takes real skill and practice.
Taping on a nodal point of a vibrating string without muting it, is easy!... if it's only one note on one string. 💗
Post Reply